The GameWizard App – Updated

Game Wizard App
Game Wizard App

We just updated the GameWizard App again. Hopefully, everyone has enjoyed using the App because it’s taken a lot of work to get here.

Background Work

Before we started working on the changes, one thing we really wanted to do was figure out a better way of keeping track of changes.  This was partly because as we developed the app further, we knew we were going to diverge from the Infographic which it was based on.

So, we looked around for software.  Then, realising there was no software that worked; we ended up using a modified spreadsheet. Yup, a spreadsheet is all that we are using to track this… but it did take a while to redo the questions in the spreadsheet.

Once we got the spreadsheet sorted, we had to start adding questions and games.  That meant tracking down the right paths, figuring out the appropriate questions and the appropriate answers.  Again, that takes a while.


Code Changes

We moved a section for Non-gamers to the first question to make it much more prominent where it was hidden under ‘Strategy Games’.  We cleaned up a section on Science Fiction games to shorten a series of questions about fandoms and then expanded a series of

We also added 20 new games and cleaned up some out of print games so that the app would be more useful.  All in, just coding time; it took another 8 hours to do all this (a lot of it being bug hunting and the initial huge moves).  If you figure it takes about 24 minutes per game changed.  Of course, it isn’t that long – it probably is only about 4 or 5 minutes of actual coding time when we are just adding a new branch – it’s when we are moving entire branches out that things get complicated.

The Scope

So when we say we added 20 games, what are we talking about? Well, the first program had over 1,300+ lines of code.  These days, we split the program up to do with multiple areas (cacheing, design, etc) and it’s harder to get a line count, but just the code for the games themselves are over 1,700+ lines of code.

In terms of game, we have 132 games now.  So, 20 games is a 15% increase to the number of games available.  To compare though, we have over 1,500+ SKUs (not individual games, games & expansions); so figure 1,100 or so individual games.  Or put another way, we are only 10% of the way to the number of games we have listed on the site.

On the other hand, we aren’t going to recommend all the games available – so we are probably 30 – 40% of the way to where we’d be happy with the app.

The Question

So, looking at the app, which area do you think we need to expand most desperately? Which questions need more refining to offer more choices and which games should we add to those choices? I know we’re a bit lacking in wargames, but that’s a really tough section as we’re not wargamers.



Building the Game Wizard

As many of you have, hopefully, seen; our Game Wizard has been released to the wide world.  Hopefully everyone is finding it as useful as the infographic which it is based on.  I thought in the blog post I’d talk abit about the development process.

The Data

The data was actually very easy – we already created it for the infographic.  Luckily, since we know the games well enough, creating the data for the infographic wasn’t that hard either – it was just a matter of taking the time to develop the various trees and making sure we didn’t double-up.

The Development

In this case, I went outside my usual developers for the site and used another 3rd party.  I had been talking to them for a while now on a few other infographics and they had shown me the work they had done before so I figured they could do this well enough.  The quote they provided was acceptable too, somewhat on the higher end of what we wanted to pay but decent.  I decided not to try the oDesk / Freelance job site this time as I wanted a design that would be coded decently well and previous experience had shown that results from such sites were widely variable.

With this local design company, we had to go through a couple of design changes, mostly tweaks to the original design they sent us.  The major issue came when they started trying to hook the design / information up to our sites database.  Unfortunately, Magento is an extremely complicated e-commerce platform and while I had asked them their experience (and received assurances of competence), they actually had no idea what they were getting into.  Instead of a 1 month delivery date, it took over 3 months with numerous back and forths.  One last, major issue, was the huge delay in displaying products when an item was finally called.  In the end, we decided to take the application as it stood.

Once we got the files, we took the final application and brought it to our usual developers (Collins Harper) and had them code in a cache system.  It should be running properly now, with a cache set-up to run once a day to keep load-times for product pages nice and fast.

In the end, we got an app, but it wasn’t what we fully wanted.  Unfortunately, the budget has now been spent.

The Final Product

So, you’ve seen the app/  It’s not what we wanted – the front-end is nice, but there are certain aspects of the backend that we really wished had been done.

  • It’s not possible for us to integrate the design into the main site without ripping the entire code apart.
  • There is no backend so all changes have to be hard-coded. This was definitely not part of our intention.
  • The code is extremely simple for others to steal.  Considering the work we’ve done, we aren’t particularly thrilled with that.  It’s not something we asked for, but it’s something we need to think about next time.

The Lessons

Firstly, we should have made sure to get full clarification (and double-check again and again) when we agreed to the work.  We thought we had an agreement on a few aspects of the business – like the backend CMS structure – but didn’t.

Secondly, double-check the credentials of the developers you use.  In particular, the software / the systems that you use – make sure the developers you hire really do know how the system works and what can / can’t be done.  If not, you’ll just add a lot of headache to the development.

Thirdly,if you have access to a developer you trust, work with them beforehand to develop a  structure / developer brief.  It’ll make your life a lot simpler and make the first issue much less of a contention.

Lastly, for me – I think I’ll go back to testing out outsourced developers for one-off projects like this (at least if CH is busy).

The Game Wizard

We’ve been working hard on this behind the scenes and it’s now ready to release.  Our Game Wizard is an interactive version of our infographic.  We’ll be updating with more questions and games, but since it’s taken so long to get done, we wanted to share it right away.

Check it out, let us know what you think and if you have branches and games to recommend; we’d love to hear from you!